Chelsea’s Shirt Sponsor MESS?

49 comentarios en «Chelsea’s Shirt Sponsor MESS?»

1. Chill out they have one already..stop bitching.

2. But the WORLD CHAMPIONS Chelsea only interested in £80-100m/yr sponsor that's why no company in the world would cough out those figures😂

3. The shirt is pretier with no sponsor

4. Without sponsor it's look more clean and elegant

5. It's not a bad look it's prestige. If you got the money go make the deal 🤝

6. chelsea is a fine club with idiot boss

7. Their white kit is the most aesthetic white kit ever any football team has ever had, with those lines

8. Even if there are sponsors for the club or their name is on the jersey, still the owners will not spend huge amounts for good players 😂😂

9. i kind of like it

10. Bringback samsung

11. The kits look way better without it

12. Chelsea don’t need that fukin 50mil bruh, we spend more on a CB in a single window 😂 🤌😮‍💨

13. It's better without scrawl on the front of a shirt its unique

14. Chelsea's owners are insanely wealthy… They'd rather not see one of their companies or share holders directly sponsor the club since they're too many who have a stake in the club… But when push comes to shove in terms of spending… These guys will blindly spend if they have to… Unfortunately…Brand means nothing to them… How deep their pockets does😅

15. This is why you need one man in power of the club. Why do you think Jose was loving it all Chelsea

16. Bring Samsung back

17. The kits actually look good without the sponsor, but yeah I get it from a business pov

18. Honestly, it's so clean I don't even realize it anymore😅

19. Honestly not having a front of shirt sponsor has made me buy 7 shirts In the last 3 years I've been so anti football shirt until these recent ones I'm so for it

20. barcelona went decades without shirt sponsors and it didn't impact them at all

21. what are u saying?

22. A loss in business isn't always a bad thing. Blue co is cooking something 😂

23. I love it wo sponsors

24. And why are you so worried. Are you suffering. Get over it.

25. Can't remember where I heard it, but one of the football journos said, the value of the offers coming in for shirt deals is less than the Spurs deal and they do not want to devalue the shirt sponsor value and they will not accept anything less than the Spurs shirt deal as it will put other future deals less than Spurs

26. How can having no sponsors be bad lol
    This guy just have no content

27. This has to be a flex on all the other teams. Like Barça when the had Unicef.

28. This is the first time I've ever seen somebody upset about the jersey not having a sponsor. I grew up watching the NBA and people were PISSED when they started with that BS

29. Much rather every club have no sponsor it looks so much better

30. Kits look SO much better without crappy sponsors

31. As a fan those would be the only kits shirts I'd buy when they don't have a sponsor on them. But from a PSR perspective it's just madness that Boehly and his crew have this mental view that unless a sponsor matches their valuation then they'd rather go with no sponsor at all. Marinakis did it too a few seasons ago and the lost revenue would have saved them from a points deduction for a psr breach

32. I think chelsea is gearing up to go the same route that Napoli is going in regards to their shirts where it would be produced in house allowing them to keep more revenue from it. Don't be surprised if our next shirt manufacturer is Armani

33. I thought City proved FFP was toothless…

34. What "prestige and reputation" do Chelsea have 😂

35. They will just buy another hotel and then sell it to themselves or sell the under 21s or something 😂

36. And they were cheating 😂the new owners found everything out. So they can't have any sponsorship

37. Did Stake pay for this short? They pay a load of influencers and this short comes off like seeding the idea among supporters. Why was the call to action after you mentioned stake?

38. How is lack of a sponsor hurting the clubs brand and reputation??😂😂

39. What are you talking about? Not having a sponsor is like the biggest flex ever.

40. Is it your f*cking problem 🙄

41. Don’t need one kit looks good

42. I love that we have no sponsor as kits looks better without it. Or i will love Samsung to come back, so many good memories with them as sponsor

43. I'm with anti-gambling sponsors
    If Chelsea gets sponsor I'm curious how they would look with Toyota

44. Man Utd doesn't have a deal with Snapdragon, which isn't even a company, but a product line. They have a deal with Qualcomm, who is the manufacturer of Snapdragon CPUs

45. They should go back to Samsung or Yokohama

46. You answered my question

47. Pls partner with nintendo or othe gaming company

48. Getting a sponsor or Money is never Chelsea's problem

49. 😅😅😅

Los comentarios están cerrados.